Right of Reply: Jonathan Shaw

Major General Jonathan Shaw
Wednesday 12 May 1999 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The Labour MP for Chatham replies to

a leading article

on proportional representation

YOUR EDITORIAL described the elections in Scotland and Wales as "a victory for proportional representation".

However, fans of PR should take note of the frenetic horse-trading that has taken place. In neither Scotland nor Wales did any party achieve a majority to form an administration. The proposals for power-sharing in Scotland tell us much about the policy sacrifices that some smaller parties are willing to make in order to have a slice of power. So now we see a party campaign for specific policies which are promptly ditched in the hope of a few seats around the cabinet table! It's clear that PR leads to policy inertia and political instability.

However, it is also fair to say that first-past-the-post voting for the Westminster parliament is perhaps not the fairest system. In the past we have seen administrations that have been in power without the support of the majority of the electorate.

Alternatively, what I, with over 100 hundred other Labour MPs, favour is a preferential system that makes voting fairer - yet maintains the vital link between an individual and their MP, what Jack Straw called "the basis of our democratic accountability". The Alternative Vote provides for stable government but also requires each MP to command at least 50 per cent of the vote. PR is not going to address low turnout. People vote regardless of the method.

The people of Scotland and Wales deserve their new assemblies and perhaps PR is OK for devolved assemblies. But at Westminster I want to see MPs who represent a majority of constituents. I want a stable government that is free from the horse-trading and the ditching of policies to satisfy minority parties which PR brings.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in