RIGHT OF REPLY / In answer to his critics, Nick Broomfield says, 'Narcissistic? Moi?

Nick Broomfield
Wednesday 25 May 1994 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

'IS Alan Whicker called narcissistic? Is Michael Palin? Or interviewers like Robin Day? By virtue of being in front of the camera, does that mean you're narcissistic? My films are to do with storytelling - not with any need to show my fine features - in a way that involves the

audience.

'I have made films in a very different style. This is just a particular way of telling a story. Documentary formats should be allowed to change; the trouble is if you break an established way of telling a story, some people prove resistant to it.

'The Margaret Thatcher film was about a very public figure. I wanted to entertain people who don't have a specialised knowledge about Thatcher or might not be avid newpaper readers, and who probably wouldn't watch a Dispatches or a Panorama.

'It all comes down to giving the viewer enough information to follow the story. Obviously if, for example, you've got a lot of phone calls and you can't film the person at the other end of the call, you're stuck with filming yourself.

'I think the more personal people make their films, the more interesting they are. Anything that involves an audience in something beyond telling the objective truth - which is a load of bollocks anyway - is very interesting.

'The whole old BBC way with an apparently impartial voice telling the so-called objective truth should have been completely discredited. There is no such thing as objective truth; what there is is subjective truth and the storyteller, and I think the audience needs to know a bit about the story- teller to be able to decide whether they believe the story.

'I spent years making films in a more traditional style. But very often the most interesting aspects of your subjects you can't film because they're inaccessible by the traditional means. When you meet someone for the first time, those first few minutes are much more significant than when you finally sit down on the couch and start to interview them - you see a personal side. And then again when you pack the cameras up to leave. It was a question of evolving a style and structure that enables one to do that. Documentaries aren't so much about giving factual information as about giving a feel of a person or a situation.'

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in