Right of Reply

A leading paediatrician responds to concerns about some new fertility techniques

Alastair Sutcliffe
Wednesday 21 April 1999 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

CHERRY NORTON'S article "IVF study to assess risk of birth defects" raised a number of concerns about genetic defects and the well-being of children conceived from the new IVF technique called Intra-Cytoplasmic Sperm Injection, or ICSI.

In the ICSI technique, couples are helped to conceive in cases where the main problem is with the male partner having a low sperm count. A single sperm is injected into an egg collected after a conventional IVF procedure. This bypasses natural selection.

Questions have been raised about the risks entailed by such an invasive procedure.

However, ICSI has been a great success and is licensed in 59 centres in the United Kingdom. Many of those 20 per cent of couples who could not be helped by standard IVF are now managing to conceive.

Cherry Norton is right to draw attention to some of the studies in the field, but it is a little premature to suppose that children born after ICSI "are at risk of genetic defects... a genetic time bomb".

Only small proportions of men with low sperm counts have a definite genetic defect affecting their male (Y) chromosome. Their children, if male, may be at risk of inheriting the same problem. But there is no evidence to suggest that they will be at risk of other problems.

A lot of other couples need ICSI - for example those where the male partner has had an unsuccessful reversal of vasectomy, or has been treated for cancer. These couples should not be at risk.

My large, detailed study of these children at toddler age produced reassuring results.

Although a register of children conceived as a result of ICSI is the next step, so far I think that couples needing ICSI should consider the procedure safe.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in