Right of Reply

The head of the Equal Opportunities Commission says sexual equality is a human right

Kamlesh Bahl
Sunday 21 June 1998 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Last week, Anne McElvoy expressed some fears about the Equal Opportunities Commission's proposals for a new Sex Equality Law. Fear not. Social engineering is out. Building a consensus for change is in.

More than 200 organisations and individuals across the spectrum responded to our proposals on replacing the old Sex Discrimination and Equal Pay Acts. We've seen huge support for a single statute that would protect sex equality as a basic human right.

Our proposals grew out of 22 years of front-line experience. It's clear from the thousands of calls we get each year (25,000 in 1997) and discussions with a huge network of partners that the old laws are out of date. They don't cover sexual harassment. They don't deal with transsexualism. And they don't reflect that British society has changed in two decades. There has been much progress, but there are still pervasive inequalities.

A new law will not be a panacea. Real equality will come when government, employers and other organisations build equal treatment into their goals, policies and programmes - what we call "mainstreaming" equality. Good practice and good law are needed and the EOC would like to see both in action.

Just to be clear: we don't support quotas; we support selection on merit. We also support shifting the burden of proof so that an employer has to tell an industrial tribunal or court why they treated an employee in a particular way.

Ms McElvoy asks whether she is a victim of sex discrimination or just unlucky in her workplace. She is neither. The women and men who have been denied jobs, advancement, services or opportunity simply because of their sex are the victims.

Those are the people who will be helped by a better law and good equality practice.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in