Pursuits: Bridge

Alan Hiron
Saturday 13 February 1999 01:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

SPADES WERE a popular choice of trump suit on this deal from a match of many years ago. At my table, playing a long out-dated system, East felt compelled to open One Spade.

This set me, as South, something of a problem, which I attempted to solve by passing. Nobody else took any action either and, after my lead of 4K, declarer ended with only three tricks and the loss of 400 points. Nowadays, I am sure that many Wests might dredge up a 1 no-trumps response to One Spade, hoping for the best.

At the other table East, rather more sensibly, opened One Heart and South decided to overcall with Four Spades. All passed (East quite hopefully) and West led a heart. Declarer ruffed the heart continuation and started on trumps but East won the second round and continued forcing with hearts. It was all over now, and declarer was bound to lose four tricks and 100 points.

Well, our team had gained handsomely on the deal, but it could quite easily have gone the other way. How should the declarer in Four Spades have tackled his contract? To have had any chance of success he had to find the missing diamonds divided 3-2. It would have cost him nothing to cash his two top winners in the suit and then concede a diamond before touching trumps.

Now, if East continues his forcing defence, South can ruff his remaining diamonds with dummy's 410 8. If the defenders over-ruff or lead trumps at any stage, South is again in control and duly comes to his 10 tricks.

It is odd, is it not, how these triumphs of yesteryear stick in one's mind...

Game all; dealer East

North

410 8

!J 6 4 2

#K 9 3

210 7 6 2

West East

46 4A 5 3 2

!8 7 5 3 !A K Q 10

#10 8 #Q J 4

2K J 8 5 4 3 2Q 9

South

4K Q J 9 7 4

!9

#A 7 6 5 2

2A

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in