Pop: My, what a big lighting rig you've got

Live: UNDERWORLD ASTORIA LONDON

John L. Walters
Friday 12 March 1999 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

THE THING about Underworld is that they make repetitive electronic dance music that basically feels good and has a groove (not as easy as it sounds). They are also likeable - lovable, even. They project this likeability in a way that is larger than life on the Astoria's wide stage, in front of a matrix of five giant screens alternately showing abstract designs and closed-circuit TV images of the players.

Yet they do seem genuinely nice, your average guys-next-door, with pounds 30,000 worth of electronics but thoughtful enough to use headphones after 11pm without being asked. Your mother would like them.

What they do on stage is something like a recording studio mixing session turned into a performance. They all wear cordless headphones. Darren Emerson and Rick Smith operate faders and mute switches on a couple of mixers and Karl Hyde moves restlessly around the stage, sometimes twiddling what sounds like the filters of an analogue synthesiser, occasionally picking up a tambourine and, on one number, strapping on a type-decorated guitar.

It's Hyde's vocals, largely incomprehensible, repetitive yet compelling, that establish the rapport with the audience. He bends and crouches, side- on, radio mic in hand, with elegant/awkward gestures and contortions rippling around his skinny frame. When he isn't singing, which is most of the time, Hyde remains in the spotlight, sidling between the equipment manned by Smith and Emerson, making gestures of support to his colleagues or to the audience.

His stamina is enviable, but the Underworld show isn't really about the physical performance of songs. The show is a continuous two-hour audio- visual experience, based around repetition and electronic sound and four- square beats over which the five screens flash type and abstract images that sometimes complement and at other times contest the sound churning out.

The gargantuan rock'n'roll lighting rig, looking many times more expensive and sophisticated than the sound gear, has strobes, spotlights, rotating searchlights and blinding flashguns trained on the audience, building to the point where the (predominantly male) ticket-holders are brilliantly floodlit in time to the opening chords of "Born Slippy".

People dance or at least jiggle to their grooves, in a tradition of out- of-time English dancing that stretches back generations. Where the sampled kick drums go "duh, duh, duh, duh", the dancers seem to hear only "brnyah, brnyah, brnyah, brnyah". Underworld don't mind. They're nice guys, after all, and when you make repetitive electronic dance music, this is what happens.

On stage they are turning what was once a boring, unglamorous, non-real- time process - studio work - into a performance. That it succeeds as entertainment is mainly down to Hyde. You can't keep your eyes off his mercurial, campy manoeuvres. Their easy listenability is down to Smith's inventive production, and the trio's collective instinct for tasty sounds.

Underworld's repetitive electronic dance music dresses and undresses the skeletal structure of hard, explicit, four-four beats in a way that leaves their dope-smoking, lager-swilling - but basically quite nice - audience wanting more.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in