Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

News scientist

NET GAINS

Mike Higgins
Saturday 13 November 1999 01:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Popular science has been a phenomenon for most of this decade. Yet, it's been left to the traditional publishing routes and media to make more accessible realms which were hitherto thought to be of interest to specialists only. The Internet, while well placed to deliver accessible and up-to-date science news, has been slow to exploit the topicality of popular science.

Science Daily epitomises this attitude (sciencedaily .com). As its name suggests, the site is a daily digest of the latest scientific developments. Though I've no idea of the veracity of the stories posted, it appears comprehensive; the news is organised by topic, or headlines with summaries.

Even the journals which have played a big part in the popularisation of science issues are guilty of a lack of on-line imagination. The New Scientist site is nothing of the kind in fact, being a teaser for potential subscribers to the magazine (newscientist.com). Only a selection of current articles is published along with an equally selective archive, and none of the design flair which characterises the mag itself has made it to the site. Though a little more generous in terms of content, the Scientific American site is just as uninspired (sciam.com).

If you can accept its perfunctory design, the best science news site currently is Sci Tech Daily (scitechdaily. com). More or less a links page, it has culled the best science features, news stories and book reviews from dozens of science magazines, journals and newspapers.

Red all over

www.redheadclub

Oh, dear. I go surfing in an attempt to reaffirm my gingerness, only to discover what a rough deal red-heads are given on the Web. Once the requisite film-star fan sites have been negotiated (Maureen O'Hara, Nicole Kidman etc), the dearth of decent auburn-themed sites becomes apparent. There is the odd red-head ring, like Redhead Lovers (geocities. com/Wellesley/9895/ redheadlovers.html), but these are private member affairs, requiring you to offer a site of your own as part of the joining deal. Only one site I came across took a stand and wore its russet colours on its sleeve: The Redheads International (redheadclub. com). Even then, the shrill tone of outrage directed at what it perceives to be anti-ginger injustice is hardly attractive. Besides the campaigning, though, there are a few mildly diverting minutes to be spent in the site's red-head encyclopaedia.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in