Network: Feedback
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Janet should not censor students
Eva Pascoe's column on the restrictions placed on certain forms of expression by the Joint Academic Network ("The things Janet won't tell you", 21 September) is disturbing. It seems to me that one of the major functions of an academic computer network such as Janet is to encourage debate, not just between academics but between students.
Maybe I'm wrong, but I thought university was about encouraging debate and giving students the chance to forward their views on whatever issue engages their interest, regardless of how controversial those views may be. If students are deemed too sensitive to handle, let alone argue against, a few strongly voiced opinions on Janet, then as Pascoe quite rightly said, we will get the underdeveloped graduates we deserve.
In my experience, the Net is the ideal place to develop debating skills. Lively debates often involve a clash of strongly held opinions and, inevitably, the adrenaline will flow as passions are aroused. If this is deemed to be unacceptable because it may cause "anxiety", then I fear for academic freedom and for free speech.
David Amis
kam76@dial.pipex.com
Eva Pascoe draws the correct assumptions on how "the art of censorship" is practiced today on the Internet (Network, 21 September). Illustrating how a Kurdish Freedom Movement web site was removed by a university server recently because of "pragmatic" reasons, she rightly draws the conclusion that technical considerations can often mask moral opposition to "problematic" content.
This is a trend that is on the increase, with more and more web sites being pulled for excuses of "copyright infringement or contractual obligations", which, in fact, turn out to be Internet Service Providers acting on their perceived moral obligations to protect us from the "excesses" of the Internet.
Pascoe sees this as being problematic for university students being able to develop their critical faculties where anything "difficult" is removed. Unfortunately, this is not just an issue for students, but for all of us - unless you want the web to become like Channel 5!
Martyn Perks
martynp@easynet.co.uk
Letters should be e-mailed to network@independent.co.uk or posted to Feedback, Network, The Independent, One Canada Square, Canary Wharf, London E14 5DL. Letters should contain a postal address and telephone number, and may be edited for length and clarity
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments