Royal Concertgebouw / Jansons, Barbican, London

Bayan Northcott
Wednesday 15 June 2005 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

As current norms of concert planning go, this first of two programmes at the Barbican by the Royal Concertgebouw Orchestra of Amsterdam under its new chief conductor, Mariss Jansons, looked conventional enough: Stravinsky's Petrushka in its 1947 revision, followed the Symphony No 2 in D major of Brahms. In fact, it comprised a complementary balance of opposites, designed to show off the range of its performers' skills.

As current norms of concert planning go, this first of two programmes at the Barbican by the Royal Concertgebouw Orchestra of Amsterdam under its new chief conductor, Mariss Jansons, looked conventional enough: Stravinsky's Petrushka in its 1947 revision, followed the Symphony No 2 in D major of Brahms. In fact, it comprised a complementary balance of opposites, designed to show off the range of its performers' skills.

Where the Brahms unfolds an organic continuity of developing thematicism in warmly blended orchestral textures, the Stravinsky comprises a cross-cut collage of vernacular tune snippets, dance patterns and bright textural patches - almost defiantly anti-developmental in its structure. As Stravinsky himself would doubtless have insisted, while the Brahms allows for an expressive flexibility, his own score demands an exactitude of execution.

Maybe the Concertgebouw, with its integrated roundness of tone - those mellow horns with their slight vibrato, those distinctive oboes - lacks the last degree of edgy brilliance that the Stravinsky ideally needs; maybe Jansons failed to secure quite the right balance in Petrushka's furious outbursts in the second scene, or perfect unanimity on the score's crucial last pizzicato note. All the same, this was pretty good, with incisive, well-judged tempo changes and a marvellous physicality in later fairground episodes such as the Coachmen's Dance.

Few movements seem to accommodate a wider range of approaches than the golden opening Allegro non troppo of the Brahms. Jansons adopted a forward speed from the start, dropping the exposition repeat and pressing urgently, yet unhurriedly, onward, keeping the entire structure airborne in a single sweep.

Brahms barred much of his slow second movement oddly, forcing players to phrase across the beat to bring out the music's underlying disquiet. Here again, Jansons refused to linger, making much of those sinister moments when the trombones snarl.

His accounts of the two final movements were appropriately graceful and joyous respectively, but perhaps not so distinctive.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in