Prom 60: Orchestre National De France/Masur, Royal Albert Hall<img src="http://www.independent.co.uk/template/ver/gfx/twostar.gif"></img >

Keith Potter
Monday 04 September 2006 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

National stereotyping is to be avoided as much as a fresh look at an orchestral warhorse is to be encouraged. But I couldn't help concluding that this scheduling of a Russian symphony performed by a French orchestra under a German conductor was a mistake. And if the Orchestre National de France is hardly unusual in its tendency to avoid overtly national characteristics, it still seemed odd to precede Shostakovich's Leningrad Symphony with a recent work by Kurt Masur's compatriot, Hans Werner Henze.

In the Shostakovich symphony that has a bigger reputation for bombast and banality than any of its colleagues, Masur's careful control of tempi and atmosphere was arguably welcome. But as this performance moved on - and the Leningrad does have its longueurs - the lack of acid in the third movement's wind chorales and rambling string recitatives, and that movement's failure to catch fire in the supposedly more incisive middle section, led to frustration and boredom.

If Masur was attempting to bring some symphonic cohesion to this rambling collection of ideas, it didn't come across. Was he saving it all for the finale, not shooting his bolt too soon? Sadly, the suspicion that there was actually no bolt to shoot was confirmed as the fourth movement was treated in much the same well-behaved way. Only the final blaze of somewhat blowsy brass playing (the big brass section here coming closest to a typically Russian sound) hinted at how this symphony must ultimately be tackled to move and challenge its listeners as it should. Come back Valery Gergiev, all is forgiven.

This perfectly decent but unexceptional visiting orchestra was in some respects shown off to better advantage in Henze's Five Messages for the Queen of Sheba. A short, five-movement spin-off from the composer's latest opera, The Hoopoe, it shows Henze at his usual business in his 80th-birthday year: colourful, energetic, lyrical, sometimes rivalling Shostakovich for cheesiness. And ultimately completely empty.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in