London Schools SO/Segerstam, Barbican, London

Robert Maycock
Friday 15 April 2005 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Long a byword for polished and inspirational concerts, the London Schools Symphony Orchestra was for once deserted by its usual large audience.

Long a byword for polished and inspirational concerts, the London Schools Symphony Orchestra was for once deserted by its usual large audience. Could it have been the prospect of Leif Segerstam's Symphony No 113? Even in the unlikely event that they had heard some of the other 112, LSSO supporters are usually willing to give novelty a go.

More likely is that London hardly ever witnesses this unique composer-conductor's extraordinary musicianship. Larger than life in everything except height, Segerstam has run parallel careers as pianist and violinist too. The symphonies aren't miniatures either, though he has ingenious ways of sharing the creative work with the performers.

For an orchestra of learners, the situation is much more involving than making sense of somebody else's instructions. Segerstam's score is like a minute analysis of a symphony, setting up overall proportions, the nature of the material, the way to develop it and the goals to aim for. The players have to make decisions about detail and timing. Segerstam even requires that there should be no conductor, and he spent the performance lurking at one of the symphony's two pianos while the orchestra, with no visual cues from him and a minimum from anybody else, kept together mainly by using their ears.

It worked wonderfully well. The various sections' music is carefully designed so that clashes are almost impossible, and the deliberately out-of-sync passages are quite easy to follow. It all adds up to a sense of free-flowing growth towards several widely spaced climaxes. What is missing is any attempt at sustained fast music, and on this occasion the symphony played its full hand well before the half-hour was up. Yet it still had more to say about music-making than the average fully-notated premiere foisted on a schools orchestra.

Segerstam's rostrum charisma worked its spell in a dynamic performance of the Symphony No 4 by Carl Nielsen. Famed for its duel of timpanists in the finale, the symphony can up to that point sound Nielsen's least coherent. This performance didn't do enough to clarify matters, and its relentless loudness meant that the great moments suddenly materialised out of a fog instead of sounding like long-sought arrivals.

Best were the Sibelius items that began and ended the concert: Riikka Hakola's powerful but sensitive dramatic soprano in Luonnotar, and the big tune of Finlandia, which went with an ecstatic spontaneity.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in