Robin Thicke sued for copyright infringement by Marvin Gaye's family
Gaye children claim Thicke copied a number of their father's songs including 'After The Dance' and 'Got to Give it Up'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Marvin Gaye’s family are suing singer Robin Thicke for copyright infringement over his hit song “Blurred Lines”.
The late soul singer’s children claim that music company EMI failed to protect their father’s legacy by letting Thicke and his co-writers plagiarise Gaye’s material, including the 1977 track “Got to Give it Up” which they say resembles “Blurred Lines”.
“Love After War”, which Thicke released in 2011, is also under fire from the Gayes, who claim it unlawfully copies their father’s 1976 song “After The Dance”.
The family is seeking to block Thicke and collaborators Pharrell Williams and TI from using elements of their father’s music.
Nona and Frankie Gaye blame EMI for breaking its contractual duty to protect Gaye’s material. They hope the lawsuit will see the company lose all profits it has made from the worldwide hit, as well as the right to manage Gaye’s catalogue of songs.
Sony-ATV, which owns EMI, said it takes its role of protecting its songwriters' works from infringement “very seriously”.
The company said in a statement that “Blurred Lines” and “Love After War” have been analysed by a “leading musicologist”, who concluded that neither of the tracks infringe Gaye’s copyright.
However, Gaye’s children have cited an interview with Thicke in GQ to support their case that he allegedly copied Gaye’s track.
Thicke told the magazine: “Pharrell and I were in the studio and I told him that one of my favorite songs of all time was Marvin Gaye's 'Got to Give It Up.'
Enjoy unlimited access to 100 million ad-free songs and podcasts with Amazon Music
Sign up now for a 4 month free trial (3 months for non-Prime members)
Enjoy unlimited access to 100 million ad-free songs and podcasts with Amazon Music
Sign up now for a 4 month free trial (3 months for non-Prime members)
"I was like, 'Damn, we should make something like that, something with that groove.' Then he started playing a little something and we literally wrote the song in about a half hour and recorded it."
In a later interview with TMZ, Thicke said he did not think of Gaye when he wrote “Blurred Lines.”
The Gaye’s case was put forward in response to a pre-emptive lawsuit filed by Thicke and Williams in August to prove that “Blurred Lines” did not copy “Got to Give It Up”.
Howard King, who represents Thicke and Williams, said the Gayes' lawsuit was not unexpected and rejected the notion that EMI ignored improper copying of Gaye's music. "EMI is in the business of collecting money for infringements," King said.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments