Mick Jagger shares video of himself dancing after recovering from 'heart surgery'
The 75-year-old rocker has his iconic moves back
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Mick Jagger is officially back on his feet, about a month after reportedly undergoing heart surgery.
The 75-year-old shared a video of himself on Twitter on Wednesday dancing energetically in a studio, busting some of his iconic moves in front of a mirror.
Jagger chose to let the clip speak for itself and shared it without a caption.
Back in March, the Rolling Stones announced they were postponing tour dates so that Jagger could receive medical treatment.
The band’s No Filter Tour was supposed to begin on 20 April in Miami.
The singer was reportedly suffering from a heart valve issue.
Jagger has acknowledged the treatment, though he hasn’t specified the reason for it.
On 5 April, he told his fans he was doing “much better” and was “on the mend”.
A few days later, Jagger shared a photo of himself taking a walk in the park, confirming that his health was improving.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments