Preview: Eugene Onegin, Royal Opera House, London

Songs of Russians without love

Michael Church
Friday 10 March 2006 01:00 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

As the Russian opera that everybody loves, Eugene Onegin might seem the easiest thing in the world to stage. But, as the director Steven Pimlott readies his production for take-off, he sounds a note of caution.

"Tchaikovsky himself was aware that it was in some ways undramatic, with very little action apart from the central duel, and with the characters revealing themselves through monologue," Pimlott says. Moreover, Pushkin's language is delicate and ironical, Jane Austen-ish rather than Dickensian, "and somehow you've got to square these two worlds, the 1820s and late-19th century Romanticism, to which Tchaikovsky brings his own tidal wave of neurosis. You may be merely writing a letter, but the emotional content is vast."

Pimlott thinks the chorus embodies the composer's own fear of large groups of people, whether it be the peasantry or the malicious gossips at the ball. There has to be, he says, a sense of them-and-us. "We have to represent a sector of society which the principals can't relate to: Onegin because he despises it; Tatiana because she's an idealist and dreamer; and Lensky - the one person who knows what love is - because he can't find anybody to play along with his vision. Each is a 'lishni chelovek' - a superfluous person, with no aim or role in society. They are each destroyed in different ways."

In Pimlott's view, Dmitri Hvorostovsky will invest the title role with exactly the right quality. "And I think Tchaikovsky really did see himself as Onegin. Arrogant and diffident by turns, a poseur who is terrified that he is not real. Is he a genius, a fake, or just - that horrifying idea - merely ordinary? Dmitri makes us care about Onegin - which is essential for the drama to work."

Pimlott's solution to the problem of creating momentum will be, he says, to move constantly between the landscape of Russia and the landscape of the mind. "I hope we will offer a coherent and recognisable world."

In rep from 16 March (020-7304 4000)

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in