Music: The Mercury Music Prize: is there a more baffling award?

Nick Barber
Saturday 04 September 1999 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

This election is still a dead heat, according to most polls. In a fight with such wafer-thin margins, we need reporters on the ground talking to the people Trump and Harris are courting. Your support allows us to keep sending journalists to the story.

The Independent is trusted by 27 million Americans from across the entire political spectrum every month. Unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock you out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. But quality journalism must still be paid for.

Help us keep bring these critical stories to light. Your support makes all the difference.

For the televising of 1995's Mercury Music Prize-giving, a trio of pundits was assembled to weigh up the contenders, writes Nick Barber. Everything went smoothly, and each album was given its due consideration, until the panel came to Into The Blue by Guy Barker, a jazz trumpeter. Tony Parsons led the debate by saying that, personally, he didn't like jazz. The other panellists concurred. The discussion ended there.

The Mercury Prize, now in its eighth year, has always been the most baffling of record industry awards. In theory, it's simple enough. The trophy goes to the best album released in the past year by British and Irish artists.

But there's the first question: why Britain and Ireland? Why not France and Luxembourg too?

More troublesome is the Mercury's insistence on evaluating classical against folk against jazz: each genre always gets a token album on the shortlist. It would be wonderful if, just once, there were 10 classical albums in the competition, alongside the latest Robbie Williams LP.

Instead, the nominations fall into a pattern. Kate Rusby is there to stick up for folk music. Denys Baptiste is the jazzer. Thomas Ades fulfils the classical quota. The Chemical Brothers, Underworld and Faithless chip in the dance records you don't have to go to clubs to enjoy.

Talvin Singh and Black Star Liner fly the flag for the Asian/British crossover, with Singh doubling as the drum'n'bass representative. The other finalists are generally acclaimed alternative rock acts: Blur, Beth Orton, the Manic Street Preachers and the Stereophonics.

We can all grumble about a few of these names, but as cross-sections go, the list isn't a bad one. The judges no doubt did their best with the brief they were given. The question is whether anyone outside the record industry does or should care which act wins.

What, after all, will the result tell us about the victor or the runners- up or about British (and Irish) music? Surely, come Tuesday evening, the judges will pick a name out of a hat, safe in the knowledge that no one could argue logically whether the choice they've made is the right one or the wrong one.

The Mercury Awards Show: Tues, Radio 1 10.10pm and BBC2 11.15pm

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in