Monitor: US comment on the impending Senate trial of President Clinton
All the News of the World
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.WE PERSONALLY favor a bipartisan resolution of censure by the Senate. Under such a plan, President Clinton would have to accept rebuke while acknowledging his wrongdoing and the very real harm he has caused. The Congressional resolution should contain language stipulating that the President's acceptance of these findings - including a public acknowledgment that he did not tell the truth under oath - cannot be used in any future criminal trial to which he may be subject. (Gerald Ford and Jimmy Carter)
The New York Times
THE FASTER the Southern Republicans rush to dump Clinton, the greater his popularity will be among African Americans. Many blacks see impeachment as a thinly disguised attempt to hammer the President for acting and speaking out on black causes, and as a backdoor power grab for the White House in the year 2000 - and they're right. But as long as Southern Republicans control such a huge bloc of Congressional votes, they believe that impeachment is the civil war they can win. (Earl Ofari Hutchinson)
Los Angeles Times
IT WAS an earlier Democratic President, Andrew Jackson, who once told Congress that, while it was free to censure its own members, it had no right to censure the head of another, co-equal, branch of government. When he was censured, Old Hickory dared the Whigs to impeach him so he could defend himself at trial like a man. Now we have a Democratic President who wants Congress to censure him, pretty please, so he can avoid trial. Yes, surreal. Is this the Republic of Jefferson and Jackson, of Washington and Hamilton, or of PT Barnum and Bill Clinton?
Arkansas Democrat-Gazette
THE NATION will not be best served by a Senate conviction, but, whatever is to be done, "then 't were well 't were done quickly", as Macbeth said about the disposition of another leader. As for censure, nothing could be more censorious than impeachment, with which Clinton's name will be forever linked.
The Boston Globe
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments