Monitor: South African press comment on the Commonwealth as the Queen arrives for the Heads of Government Meeting

ALL THE NEWS OF THE WORLD

Friday 12 November 1999 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Cape Argus

On the eve of the new millennium, with our own freedom signalling the end of decolonisation, what point can there be to such a multicoloured beast lumbering across the global landscape for another 50 years? The importance of the Commonwealth, and the necessity of its continuance, lies in the realisation of the very dream which we in South Africa now hold so dear: strength through diversity.

It is because the Commonwealth is such a disparate group of nations that it can focus resources and speak with authority on conflict resolution, international co-operation and poverty relief. It is a role that few other multilateral bodies, including the United Nations, are capable of fulfilling. The Commonwealth has played a key role in South Africa's own history over the past three decades, culminating in the Harare Declaration - which set out the conditions for democracy in South Africa. In a world fraught with division and violence, the Commonwealth seeks peace and upliftment, mutual support and democracy. Long may it continue.

Daily News

A new era of international renewal has dawned with the dismantling of the former Soviet Union and the democratisation of numerous former dictatorships, many in Africa. The time for change is ripe. For this reason alone, President Thabo Mbeki, having already expounded his philosophy of an African renaissance to the United Nations and others, is certain to woo his Commonwealth counterparts to his cause.

And there could be no better forum. Colonial Britain and other industrialised Commonwealth countries reaped obscene profits by exploiting (in the very harshest sense of the word) the resources of Africa - from slaves and cheap labour to gold and ivory. And all in the name of the Empire. If the Commonwealth, born from the decay of that faded Empire, is to continue to have relevance for all its members on its 50th anniversary, these iniquities of the past must be confronted and expunged. If Durban and KwaZulu-Natal (frequently whimsically referred to as the Last Outpost of the British Empire) can be instrumental in revitalising the Commonwealth, it will be a moment of sublime historic irony. May the Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting deliver the goods.

The Star

Even before she arrived, we knew that Britain's head of state was about to "express regret" over the loss of life in the Anglo-South African War.

What a new world this is. To some people - and it is a sadness that Robert van Tonder is no longer with us to give punchy personification to the dissident view - "regret" is hardly the word to compensate for the imperialist aggrandisement of her forebears.

Technically, the dissidents have a pretty good case. [The Anglo-South- African] war was deeply inexcusable even in the context of the invariable banality of war. Nonetheless, "regret" is a sentiment that would have been unthinkable even a few years ago.

At the time of the war, indeed at all times in history with the sole exception of our own time, it has been simply taken for granted that this was a planet of tribes and frontiers; that if your bunch had the strength to donder some other bunch, and a halfway reasonable excuse, why then, you went ahead and dondered.

Things have changed and continue to change. A school of thought assumes that the current mode of sensitivity is no more than politically correct shamming. That is wrong. The world moves into a century where liberty and decency are for all. That's progress.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in