Monitor

All the News of the World The Chinese press responds to the bombing of their nation's embassy in Belgrade

Monday 10 May 1999 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

THE ATTACK against the Chinese Embassy was too smart to be explained as a "mistake in target identification" or technical error. And it is not just "regrettable". It is intolerable aggression and a war crime.

The attack against a diplomatic mission is unprecedented. Today, Nato's missiles fall on the Chinese Embassy. Tomorrow, destruction may fall on anyone else who dares to oppose it.

China Daily

FOR THE authorities in Beijing there is a certain fortuitousness about the timing of the incident. The fury that has erupted may well serve as a distraction for those tempted to mark the approach of June 4. But the question for Beijing now is: having turned on the protest tap so effectively, can it also be turned off so easily?

South China Morning Post

NATO SHOULD know that the district where the Chinese embassy is located is a residential area which should not have been the target of attack in the first place.

The UN Security Council has only expressed shock, but has not condemned Nato nor said it would investigate the matter.

Alas, the Security Council has been reduced to the status of a servant of the United States. If it was the US embassy which was hit by China, the US would have forced the Security Council to take much stronger measures, including military and economic sanctions.

The Chinese embassy is China's territory. When the embassy is attacked, China should react strongly, including recalling its representative in the US. If China does not respond immediately, the US will think it is weak.

Sing Pao

BEIJING MUST pursue the matter to the very end, to ask for a Nato cease- fire, to get fair compensation and to find out who was responsible. The missile attack on the embassy has underlined the importance of seeking a speedy end to the crisis through diplomatic means. Strategic errors by Nato have already caused the bombing to drag on. When Nato keeps escalating its bombing , loss of innocent lives is unavoidable.

Tin Tin Daily News

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in