Letters: Wheels vs feet
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Darius Sanai's article on the "warfare" between different road users (1 September) brings to mind experiments where rats competing for scarce resources (in this case road space) quickly display symptoms of stress, aggression and violence.
Be under no illusion, however. Motorists have been the overwhelming winners in the rat-race created by post-war transport policy. This is not to imply that motorists are more rat-like than other road users. Most are also pedestrians, cyclists and bus passengers. But for decades, transport planners have consistently given priority to people travelling in cars when allocating road space, time and money.
John Prescott's transport White Paper made a commitment to changing this allocation, by shifting some of these resources from private cars to pedestrians, cyclists and public transport users. Wider pavements, more bus and cycle lanes, better pedestrian crossings and new pedestrian priority areas should be the result. Recent research suggests such measures could lead to traffic "evaporation" rather than gridlock.
As this reallocation takes place, however, it is vital to remember that the needs of pedestrians and cyclists are not identical, even though both have much to gain from traffic reduction. Poorly designed "shared use" routes (such as white lines on pavements) benefit neither group. Walkers need proper pavements, free of all vehicles. Cyclists need safe tracks, in the carriageway or, physically separated from pedestrians, across parks and commons. Otherwise the rat race will continue.
BEN PLOWDEN
Director
The Pedestrians Association
London EC1
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments