Letters: Perils of speed
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Perils of speed
Sir: In the debate about speed limits (letters, 22, 23, 24, 27 September), the assertion is often made that it is bad driving that causes accidents, not speed. This is disingenuous. As speed increases, the margin for error becomes less favourable and the risk of accident increases, no matter how accomplished the driver.
Speed limits need to reflect the capabilities of the typical road user. Most are not expert cricketers or mathematicians, so it is reasonable to assume they are not expert drivers either. This is why many lives would be saved if we drove at a maximum of 20 mph on most urban streets, and 50 mph on single carriageways out of town.
Motorists who consider themselves highly skilled, who enjoy driving and would prefer not to slow down believe it would be terribly unfair if their experience was made less stimulating. Their disappointment would be a price worth paying.
M C ALDRIDGE
Winchester
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments