Letters in Brief

Thursday 20 August 1998 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir. In his witty analogy between the reactions of the opponents of modified food today and those contemplating the internal combustion engine 100 years ago, David Harvey (letter, 18 August) inadvertently makes the case for the sceptics.

Our forebears, while worrying about the dangers of a machine that explodes 10,000 times a minute, might not have foreseen that, in the hands of the impatient, careless and status conscious, the invention would eventually kill and maim tens of thousands of people every year across the planet, make a major contribution to climate change leading to raised sea levels, and inflict infections on countless others. My understanding is that it is precisely the long-term and unforeseeable effects of genetic engineering that worry the sceptics today.

ROGER IREDALE

Professor Emeritus, University of Manchester.

Senior Consultant, Iredale Development International Partnership

High Peak, Derbyshire

Sir: Mike Croll may well be right that a landmine ban is morally right but a waste of time (Review, 20 August). No doubt slaves felt that when slavery was banned. Banning slavery did not give them paid work or property immediately and it probably removed others' responsibility for their well being. Problems seldom have simple solutions. Give it time. In 50 years things might be different. At least there won't be more mines manufactured and laid. Just the old ones popping up and reminding us of the horrors of the past.

ANDREW PRING

Bradford

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in