Letters In Brief
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: I've read enough spy stories to know that you never, never keep a list of a large number of your "secret" agents in one place. The fact that such a list was published on the Internet means either that the unfortunate persons named are in reality very low level or that the ability to collate this information is indicative of treason near the very top. In either case, it seems the official version is, as usual, some distance from the truth.
L SALEM
London W5
Sir: So Greg Dyke says that Chris Smith "slightly" misled Parliament over their discussions about the director-general's vacancy at the BBC (letter, 13 May). Amidst all this confusion it is important not to lose sight of the fact that substantial donations to the party of government give rise to issues of public policy which would render any candidate, of whatever ability, unacceptable as the next director general.
PETER AINSWORTH MP
Shadow Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport
House of Commons, London SW1
Sir: Jonathan Shaw's Right of Reply (Review, 13 May) is misleading. In the present House of Commons, MPs in 313 seats out of 659 do not represent a majority of those who voted in their constituency, let alone "represent a majority of constituents". Moreover, the Government gained a large majority of seats with only 43.2 per cent of the vote. Scottish voters, however, are now fairly represented: all political views are reflected by an appropriate number of MSPs, with less than 5 per cent variation.
PAUL TYLER MP
Liberal Democrat Chief Whip
House of Commons,
London SW1
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments