Letters: Fear of drugs
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: In his recent article on drugs ("Our primitive fear of drugs", 17 August), the Bishop of Edinburgh bemoans the fact that the debate is not carried out in "purely moral terms". He then spends the rest of his argument suggesting that prohibition doesn't work, that alcohol abuse is worse than drug abuse, and that a middle way between prohibition and absolute licence should be followed. Not much moral argument in that lot!
Surely the issue is whether taking drugs is morally correct for the individual and society as a whole. Society has to give a lead to its members on what is good and what is bad. If it fails to do so, it will soon cease to have any rationale for its existence. Ask the alcoholic with a ravaged liver or the smoker with terminal lung cancer whether their drug is a good thing or not. Their answers will determine whether caution on the legalisation of other drugs is an act of morality.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments