Letters: Crisis in Angola

Action
Friday 20 August 1999 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Crisis in Angola

Sir: Your heart-rending report from the besieged city of Malanje exposed both the scale, but also the human face, of Angola's largely forgotten humanitarian crisis ("Under siege in Angola's saddest city, where children fight for ears of corn", 14 August). Since Unita turned its back on the UN peace process and plunged the country into war again last year, 900,000 people have fled their homes.

The international community has heavy responsibilities in Angola. It is not doing enough to meet them. First, it must step up emergency aid - especially for food and air transport - to meet the growing needs of the hungry in the besieged cities. It is a disgrace that - as you point out - the UN has had to relaunch its emergency appeal for Angola which has been less than half-met by donors. Britain can, and should, commit more.

Second, more must be done to address the war as the root cause of the human tragedy in Angola. Western powers armed and trained Unita - side- by-side with apartheid South Africa - as a pawn in their Cold War strategy, creating a monster they cannot now control.

The UN Security Council turned a blind eye as Unita failed to disarm under the 1994 Lusaka agreement, just as Unita did under the previous peace deal, allowing it to return to war after losing the 1992 elections.

Belatedly the Security Council has committed itself to tougher action against Unita through the important initiative now being spearheaded by Canada's UN Ambassador Robert Fowler - with welcome support from Britain - to make the hitherto ineffectual sanctions against Unita work in practice. Efforts must now be stepped up to see this through.

BEN JACKSON

Director

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in