Letter: Y2K troubles
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: I take issue with Charles Arthur's assertion that the Y2K problem is caused by programmers "whose fault all this is, if you'd forgotten" (Millennium Bug Watch, 8 December).
The decision to use two-digit dates was taken for cost reasons (memory was very expensive then). This happened over 30 years ago and the Y2K problem was recognised at least a decade ago (I knew about it during my school years in 1988).
Why then have the industry management and government taken so long to pull their heads out of the sand? The usual reason: it never occurred to them that to understand a complex subject well enough to make policy decisions takes time and effort (which of course is of no short-term managerial or electoral benefit to them).
MARK REARDON
Leeds
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments