Letter: Y2K nuclear peril

F. C. Starkey
Friday 03 December 1999 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: Now that we have all received the Government's booklet on the millennium bug, we can feel reasonably reassured that, give or take a glitch or two, we have nothing much to worry about.

Well, listen to the US Deputy Secretary of Defence, John Hamre: "Probably one out of five days I wake up in a cold sweat thinking [Y2K] is much bigger than we think, and then the other four days I think we are on top of it. Everything is so interconnected, it is hard to know with any precision whether we have got it fixed."

The Ministry of Defence, according to What everyone should know about the Millennium Bug, is confident that there is no risk of a nuclear weapons incident. We are not the only country parading these civilisation-busting weapons. Some 30,000 warheads are stocked or deployed around the world. No 100-per-cent fail-safe complex system has ever been invented. Only God knows the situation of Russia's nuclear forces or of other declared and undeclared nuclear states.

Failure of complicated and interconnected command and control systems could lead to false alarms and warnings of imminent attack, coupled with launch-on-warning systems and decision times of a few minutes.

The only way to be confident that there is no risk is to take all nuclear weapons off alert and preferably to separate warheads from missiles.

F C STARKEY

Pantymwyn, Flintshire

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in