Letter: Woolf pack
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: The organisers of the Post-Impressionist exhibition of 1911 performed an act of cultural heroism that shames the shallow, sentimental analysis afforded them by Philip Hensher in his article "Does anyone actually like any of this Bloomsbury Group rubbish?" (4 November).
He claims that "for heaven's sake, someone else would have done the same thing". Who does he suggest? The hundreds of thousands of working people who fought for life in the post-industrial slums? The gung-ho, xenophobic bourgeoisie and aristocracy who forbade their women to attend the exhibition? The hostile press who lampooned the paintings and their patrons? No one would deny that Bloomsbury was often as silly as it was interesting. But the exhibition, in both aims and content, was the work of pioneers. Which is more than can be said of Mr Hensher's article. Cultural fascism has been done.
JUSTIN TREFGARNE
Frant, East Sussex
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments