Letter: Wildlife still in peril
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Letter:
Wildlife still in peril
Sir: Ironically, the new protection given to "Special Areas of Conservation" could make them more, rather than less, susceptible to the road builders.
In the case of Twyford Down, the Government's cost-benefit analysis valued land at its commercial value without planning permission. Under this assumption, protected sites are given less value than, say, agricultural land, and so SSSIs appear highly desirable for development.
Conversely, the use of land with less ecological worth but more commercial value, such as brownfield sites, will have been ruled out long before the planners present their shortlist of options to their political masters. While the initial sift of routes continues to be carried out using such dubious economics, many more sites of ecological importance will disappear under the bulldozer.
GRIFF KANE
Blyth, Northumberland
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments