Letter: Why peers must go
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: It would be a sad commentary on the state of politics in our country if one of the consequences of the rejection by the House of Lords of the "closed list" system for the European elections were for the Government to act like a spiteful teenager who has not got his/her way.
There may be good arguments for the reform of the upper chamber but they should not arise from an emotional response. Rather they should be based on a careful and, as far as possible, a non-partisan consideration of how a second chamber should be constituted for the twenty-first century.
As when the Lords rejected the lowering of the age of consent for homosexual practices, they were probably far more reflective of the interests of the majority of the population than would be a chamber filled with Mr Blair's cronies.
Nowadays I vote for the candidate whose overall values are the closest to my own, which will not necessarily be represented by a particular party manifesto. As a Christian I am interested in where a candidate stands on matters that may not figure highly in a manifesto, such as those related to the family, or Third World issues, and I want someone to represent me whom I can respect, even in their private life.
It is not for Mr Blair to effectively disenfranchise us by taking this right away. It is he, not the House of Lords, who is undermining democracy by his insistence on closed lists.
JOHN WAINWRIGHT
Potters Bar,
Hertfordshire
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments