Letter: What is poverty?
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: In their letter on the extent and causes of poverty, Lord Russell and David Rendel call for welfare benefits to be increased, citing the Acheson report as finding benefit levels "to be too low to be compatible with good health" (letter, 9 September). In fact the report was somewhat ambiguous on the effects of increasing benefit levels.
The report claimed that empirical research "demonstrated that people living on low incomes ... have insufficient money to buy items and services necessary for good health", despite finding that "there is a lack of experimental evidence that increasing financial resources results in measurable health gain".
The Acheson report added little new to what had already been written and researched on the subject of poverty. It relied heavily on the previous findings of pressure groups and their academic acolytes.
Had the report ignored these biased findings and instead focused on the reasons why very many people on benefit do not suffer bad health or run out of money and concentrated on ways of helping those not so fortunate to manage their low resources better, we might have seen a cross-party consensus on action to alleviate poverty. Instead, we have the endless and fruitless debates on how much to raise taxes by to increase further the level of benefits which pressure groups will forever say is inadequate.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments