Letter: Votes that count
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: The idea of making elections with a turnout of below 50 per cent invalid (letter, 29 November) is deeply flawed. In Italian referendums, which need a 50 per cent turnout for a majority in favour to be valid, the opposition simply encourages its supporters not to vote and so defeat a proposition that has far more supporters than opponents.
A far better solution for the problem of low turnouts would be to use the single transferable vote (STV) electoral system, in which very few votes are wasted.
Under the first-past-the-post system, elections in marginal seats normally have higher turnouts than in safe seats, as fewer people feel that voting is a waste of time.
STV allows voters to place candidates in order of preference and means that a majority on an elected body really is a majority. Surely coalition governments are better than the Poll Tax, rail privatisation and control- freakery.
DAVID NOWELL
St John's College,
Cambridge
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments