Letter: Violence against GPs

Jean Robinson
Tuesday 14 December 1999 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: We naturally want doctors and others serving the public to be protected against violence. But once again the Department of Health has had discussions only with the doctors' trade union and has not given consumer organisations a chance to contribute before coming up with a draconian policy that on the sole word of a GP, a patient will be banned from normal health care ("Violent patients face ban from GPs' surgeries", 8 December).

We find this particularly worrying since we know of cases where GPs have made unfounded allegations as soon as the patient made a complaint about quality of care - or even intimated that they might do so. A major study of doctors' responses to complaints showed that in half the cases the patient or lay carer was blamed, and doctors attributed the problem to the personality of the complainant. We have seen many allegations on case notes about patients' behaviour which they denied and were sometimes able to disprove.

Studies on psychiatric patients have shown that violent incidents can be provoked by poor management and staff behaviour. Patients in poverty and bad housing, and those with a past history of sexual abuse, sometimes have a low toleration threshold and are often misunderstood. In some families violent language is part of normal everyday conversation but does not necessarily mean a real threat. All these people are at risk under the new policy - from some GPs but not others.

There were many other relevant points we and other groups could have put to Alan Milburn, the Secretary of State for Health, had we been given a chance.

JEAN ROBINSON

Hon Research Officer

Association for Improvements in the Maternity Services

Oxford

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in