Letter: Victims of Mitch

Lewis Cleverdon
Saturday 07 November 1998 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: A fortnight ago my neighbour was killed while trying to save his cattle from rising floodwaters here in Herefordshire. His death and the floods in general received wide press coverage. By contrast, the body- count and economic damage due to Hurricane Mitch is of too vast a scale to allow more than vague estimates to me made.

I note with dismay the lack of press inquiry into the rising frequency of such catastrophic climatic impacts. Over two years ago the Rome-based Global Dynamics Institute presented the UN conference on Climate Change with evidence of the strong correlation between rising global temperature and the rising incidence of extreme weather events.

The scientific expectation is that losses from events such as Hurricane Mitch will become increasingly common as climate destabilisation advances.

Poor nations' economies will be (and are being) pushed out of manageable fragility into progressive collapse, while wealthier nations are likely to face untenable economic disruption. This position will worsen until: global emissions of the relevant gasses are cut by well over 70 per cent; self-fuelling "feedback-loops" in the planet's warming have been decelerated; and time-lags in the system of perhaps several decades' length have been endured.

The longer our society's attitude of "sod the grandchildren" persists, the more uncertain will be our ability to reverse the warming trend, even by ending our fossil-fuel dependence. Therefore I would ask just how many more people, of whatever colour, must be killed before you will call for our economy to be put onto a war footing to respond effectively to global warming?

Lewis Cleverdon

Kington, Herefordshire

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in