Letter: Viagra rationed
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: The important point about the Viagra debate is that the politicians are, in effect, making clinical judgements. In the "rationing by queuing" situation, the judgements on who should get priority are made on medical need by medically qualified people who have an intimate knowledge of the patients concerned.
None of these conditions apply when a politician is making such a decision. Once the principle of political clinical judgement has been accepted, patients who may have been deemed to have "self-inflicted health problems", such as smokers and drinkers, could be the next to be excluded. No doubt after a well-orchestrated "spin doctoring" campaign with the co-operation of the abstemious media.
GRAHAM FISK
Birmingham
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments