Letter: Value of GCSE

Ron McLone
Monday 30 August 1999 00:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: Your suggestion that GCSEs should be abolished (leading article, 26 August) is very worrying.

GCSEs have been very motivating to students. Far more now stay on after 16 to study A-levels or for vocational courses. But it does not follow that this success makes the GCSE redundant.

A-levels are simply no substitute. For one thing over half of our young people do not take A-levels. Your proposal would have many of them leaving school with nothing at all to recognise their achievements. There would also be no assessment at the close of both compulsory schooling and of the National Curriculum. The Government, rightly, requires certain things to be taught to children. We need to find out if they are actually learning.

Even those who take A-levels often take only three subjects. We would have scientists leaving school with no qualification in English and arts and humanities students who have never been examined in maths. GCSEs provide a genuine measure across the broad range of subjects in the National Curriculum, while allowing time for children to prove that they have learned other things outside the compulsory curriculum.

RON McLONE

Head of Policy

Oxford, Cambridge and RSA Examinations

Cambridge

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in