Letter: Uranium weapons

Felicity Arbuthnot
Tuesday 30 November 1999 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: Dave Andrews' sanguine view of the nuclear industry in general and depleted uranium ammunition in particular (letter, 29 November) is not shared by the US Army Environmental Policy Institute (AEPI), whose manuals devoted to the subject include warnings such as: "If DU enters the body it has the potential to generate significant medical consequences. The risks associated with DU in the body are both chemical and radiological." It adds: "Replacing the DU in weapons systems with a non-toxic material would mitigate the health risks associated with DU."

The US General Accounting Office studies on the subject conclude: "Inhaled insoluble oxides stay in the lungs longer and pose a potential cancer risk due to radiation. Ingested DU dust can also pose a radioactive and toxicity risk." The AEPI concludes that "DU is a low-level radioactive waste and therefore must be deposited in a licensed repository." It does not say "on a school, hospital or radio station near you," as was the case in Iraq and the Balkans.

Should the syndrome of birth deformities, cancers and other health deficits which have manifested in Iraq and amongst Gulf war veterans, since 1991, appear in the Balkan region, the human toll and compensation cost will be unimaginable. It surely could not be that the latter is why there is a reluctance to address the matter at most relevant governmental levels?

FELICITY ARBUTHNOT

London E9

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in