Letter: Unkind cut
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Angela West's claim (letter, 23 September) that male circumcision is desirable in the interests of hygiene and cancer-prevention is absurd. It is easy to clean under one's foreskin. Cervical and penile cancer do appear to be linked to hygiene, but not to circumcision.
As for her suggestion that circumcision is a good thing because the result is "far more aesthetically pleasing", I wonder how many penises she is planning to look at. Must every baby boy on earth be circumcised just in case Ms West should one day feel inclined to assess the aesthetic pleasingness of his private parts? And what about all the women and gay men whose aesthetic tastes differ from hers?
If Ms West "cannot think of a good reason" for keeping foreskins where nature intended, perhaps she should ask a few uncircumcised men whether they fancy the operation. She will quickly discover one very good reason indeed: we don't like the idea of bits of our genitalia being cut off.
DAVID BISHOP
Brussels
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments