Letter: Unethical policies

The Rev Neil Dawson
Tuesday 19 January 1999 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: Thank you for your timely leading article "The Foreign Office must shrug off the burdens of the past" (14 January).

The headlines are dominated with reports about the inadequacies of our health and education systems. For many years we have invested too little in industrial and scientific research. Our public transport system is lamentable. Millions of our fellow countrymen are condemned to live on run-down, crumbling and crime-ridden estates.

At least one major reason for this state of affairs is not hard to find: we are "punching above our weight" in international affairs. Unlike our European neighbours we have invested a great deal of our self-esteem in being active in the international arena. The adventures in the Gulf, as we follow America's foreign policy, are a recent and disturbing case. We spend some 3.5 per cent of GDP on defence, twice as much as the Dutch, Danes or Germans. Contrary to popular thinking we are a rather warlike and aggressive people.

It may be that this level of defence expenditure is what "middle England" wants, as the Blair government clearly believes. But we cannot have all the things we would like, to enhance the comfort and health of our people, while we maintain our present foreign and defence policy.

The Rev NEIL DAWSON

London SW9

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in