Letter: Under the knife
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Jeremy Laurance ("Can we trust doctors when they put us under the knife?", 1 September) sees no problem with Bupa curbing a gynaecologist's freedom to perform a hysterectomy. He misses several points.
Bupa cannot prevent any surgeon performing any surgery; it can only refuse to pay the surgeon's private fee. This is not a policy driven by a desire for clinical excellence; it is a cost-cutting exercise.
Mr Laurance ignores the question of patient choice. There are many options in the management of menstrual disorders, some medical, some surgical. A hysterectomy has advantages and disadvantages, but to some women it may offer significant advantages over the alternatives. It is a once-and- for-all solution and patient satisfaction with the procedure is very high. If Bupa denies funding for a procedure chosen by an informed patient and insists on alternative therapies, it is the patient's hands that are tied, not mine.
Few gynaecologists would want to see unnecessary hysterectomies performed, but to attempt to prevent them in this manner is to misuse a blunt instrument, making it unlikely that surgical quality is the driving force behind it.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments