Letter: Tribal warfare

Tim Symonds
Tuesday 07 December 1999 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: In "Should Britain be charged with war crimes?" (1 December) David Anderson looks back at the Mau Mau emergency. Without denying that it was a true colonial war based on considerable contempt for the indigenous peoples by many, though not all, white settlers, it had complexities the writer does not mention.

One of the justifications of Pax Britannica, both in India and much of Africa, was the suppression of war between tribes. Under British rule in Kenya, a once forest-dwelling tribe, the Kikuyu, became the dominant element in most of the Civil Service and among the educated elite.

The Kikuyu and the closely related Meru and Embu tribes developed the Mau Mau to push out the British solely to colonise Kenya's economic and political structures. This was quite clear to the dozens of non-related tribes.

During the year I spent in the Mt Kenya Crown Forest in 1955 , keeping Mau Mau on the move (humans find it nearly impossible to survive in tropical forests unless they can stay relatively settled), my Masai and Kipsigis askaris harked back constantly to the arrival of the British.

They had been very sorry that we had ever come to East Africa because they had contained the Kikuyu, Meru and Embu "as honey-collectors in the forest" but foresaw Kikuyu overlordship in Nairobi the moment independence arrived.

TIM SYMONDS

London W1

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in