Letter: Trial by media
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Your leading article of 29 March highlights the way the tabloid press can harm the reputations of innocent people because they are already in the public eye. It is worse when they prematurely highlight allegations which later prove to be without foundation.
A clear example is the way the Catholic Archbishop of Cardiff, the Most Rev John Ward, has been treated for over two months. In mid-January the tabloids, followed by almost everyone else, gave considerable coverage to allegations of child rape going back to 1961. The allegations seemed highly unlikely to those like me who have known the Archbishop for many years. The publicity came even before the police could interview him. He was "innocent until proven guilty", but his reputation was already suffering serious damage.
Many of the people I met had heard all about the case and asked me more about it. Last week the Crown Prosecution Service, after carefully examining the evidence, dropped the matter. Cardinal Hume and the Archbishop himself made press statements. None of the people I meet are aware of this; I have seen and heard nothing about it in the intervening five days.
Following the premature publicity, the Archbishop had to stand aside from his public duties for over two months. The people and priests of his diocese were denied the normal pastoral care they expect from their bishop. Now the lack of prominent reports about the CPS decision seems to show that the media are more interested in destroying reputations than restoring what they have mistakenly damaged.
HUGH LINDSAY
Grange-over-Sands, Cumbria
The writer was Catholic Bishop of Hexham and Newcastle, 1974-1992
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments