Letter: Trial by jury
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: I cannot imagine where Dr Payne (letter, 20 May) has been watching magistrates in action. The police often complain that too many defendants are acquitted; is that only at the crown court?
If the right to a jury trial is restricted, as now, then a change in the exercise of that right is not a point of principle but of degree.
All defendants must have the right to a fair trial, however minor Parliament considers the crime. To ensure this, all courts must be seen to be fair. If the magistrates' courts can be shown to be as bad as asserted, then that matter needs attention independently of the right to a jury trial.
JOHN HENDERSON JP
Alton, Hampshire
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments