Letter: Trial by jury
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Amid the noise and smoke of battle over the right to jury trial ("Thousands lose right to jury trial", 19 May), I fear we are in danger of losing sight of the basic reason for its existence. For as long as the English judiciary system clings to the medieval practice of concentrating solely on prosecution, a final showdown in front of a jury is essential.
I, for one, would be content to forgo a jury trial only in a country which has an effective and independent investigation agency (such as a Procurator Fiscal or examining magistrate) which can consider the whole of the evidence, not just that deemed relevant by the police and a Crown prosecutor.
DAVID WALKER
Fareham,
Hampshire
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments