Letter: Think of England

Steve Richards
Wednesday 29 September 1999 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: Jack Straw's muddled attempt to answer the English question highlights the Government's confused thinking on this issue ("Essex man makes a plea for Englishness", 28 September).

He states: "We do not want two classes of MPs." But he is happy for there to be two classes of UK citizen. The people of Scotland have both the Scottish Executive and Scottish MPs at Westminster looking after their interests.

He says Scottish MPs should keep their "right to vote on English matters because funding decisions indirectly affected them as well.... If money is spent, frankly it could mean less money for them."

Under devolution, Scotland has a set budget based on an agreed allocation of UK funds and the Scottish Parliament exists to decide how this money is spent (and whether to raise any extra money in Scotland). Jack Straw's comments imply that Scotland can obtain extra funds if Scottish Westminster MPs block spending budgeted for England.

Scottish Westminster MPs have every right to vote on UK spending but should have no say over spending that is specific to England. The only way to make this principle absolutely clear is to have a separate Parliament for England.

STEVE RICHARDS

Chairman, Campaign for an English Parliament

King's Lynn, Norfolk

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in