Letter: The rural reality
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Letter: The rural reality
Sir: Andreas Whittam Smith's challenge to the farmer's case is overdue ("One man's dog of an argument", 1 March). Farmers constantly tell us that we should all be devastated by the consequences if the rug was pulled from under the present rural regime. But why should we be?
Current farming practices have destroyed much of the landscape attraction and wildlife value of the countryside. Meanwhile farmers resist the idea that the taxpayers and consumers who fund them should enjoy the right to walk upon their holdings.
If farm subsidies were withdrawn and inefficient farmers departed the worst that could happen is that some farmland would revert to wilderness. Farmers tell us this would lead to an invasion "scrub" which we should find intolerable. Why?
"Scrub" is part of the indigenous plant life of our country. Grassland, shrubs and bushes and the woodland into which they develop provide homes and breeding grounds for wild creatures. Other countries go to great lengths to ensure that large areas are dedicated solely to nature. The shortage of wilderness in Britain is arguably a serious problem.
In fact, however, not much land abandoned by agriculture would be likely to lie derelict. As land prices fell uses other than farming would become feasible. Nature conservation organisations would be able to buy far more land. Local authorities would be able to create more extensive country parks.
All of this would be likely to make the countryside far more attractive, useful to the citizenry and biologically diverse.
MARION SHOARD
Dorking, Surrey
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments