Letter: The role of genes

Jeff Goldberg
Wednesday 28 October 1998 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: Steven Rose propagates two misunderstandings of evolutionary psychology in his essay attacking it ("Selfish genes and how to avoid them", 26 October).

First, when he says "According to these so-called evolutionary psychologists, our thoughts and actions follow the dictates of our selfish genes" he is misinforming the reader. Evolutionary psycho-logists and even the coiner of the term "selfish gene" point out at every opportunity that genes no more drive our thoughts than pump our blood. But genes have played a role in building both our brains (which drive our thoughts) and our hearts (which pump our blood).

To call evolutionary psycho-logists "genetic determinists" is simply wrong.

Secondly, when thinking about free will, issues of genetic cause are a red herring. The question of free will is not changed at all if our behaviour is caused by "historical, social, cultural and technological" environments instead of our genes. As long as it is caused by something, the challenge to free will remains.

It is very disappointing that so well-respected a biologist continues to attribute views to evolutionary psychologists that they simply don't hold.

JEFF GOLDBERG

Cranfield, Bedfordshire

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in