Letter: Terrorism Bill impact
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: The letter of the Home Secretary's proposed Prevention of Terrorism Bill gives ample scope for anxiety about its spirit and likely impact.
Take the key phrase, "serious violence against any person or property". A court could reasonably interpret "any" as attaching as much to "property" as to "person". Now, to destroy a window, fence, gate, billboard or banner is to commit "serious violence" against it. Given political motivation, such conduct is, according to the Bill, terrorism.
If Mr Straw is the liberal he says he is, this is one of the things he should change.
TONY SKILLEN
Reader in Philosophy
University of Kent at Canterbury
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments