Letter: Teenage vote-lose
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: I was astounded to read your article regarding the possibility of teenagers being enfranchised at the age of 16 ("Vote at 16 to be considered by Ministers", 31 December).
Although at this age one is legally entitled to leave school, get married, have a child and die for one's country, one still needs parental consent to marry - thus proving that one is still not altogether autonomous. I am sure that there must be many more 16- than 18- year-olds who still live at home and rely on their parents' financial support. I think that these two vital years do make an immense difference in developing one's opinions and ideas.
If adolescents were granted the right to vote at 16 the vast majority might do so, but not necessarily for the right reasons. The bulk of 16- year-olds haven't a clue what they really want from a government and therefore would just vote as their parents do. Others might cast their vote in the opposite direction merely to be antagonistic. Many teenagers would say that it didn't matter who they voted for, as it was simply one vote. As there are 1.5 million 16- and 17-year-olds this could make a considerable difference to the outcome of an election.
I also cannot fully comprehend why the Government has been considering changing the legislation as there has been no apparent demand from teenagers.
Despite the fact that I am 13 and have very definite views on many subjects, I would prefer to wait until I am 18 and will be more mature and the issues will have more relevance to me.
CHARLOTE CASSIS
London SW11
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments