Letter: Support for Nato
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Nothing throws into sharper relief the uncertainty at the heart of Nato's war aims than the insistence on returning the refugees. After all, that is only reversing a consequence of the war. It cannot explain why we took up arms in the first place.
In theory, the answer to that is that Milosevic had to be forced to negotiate. But you can't force someone to negotiate. You can only force them to negotiate for less. Anyway, Milosevic was negotiating at Rambouillet. He just didn't accept the presence of Nato troops in Kosovo.
And so we went to war to make him swallow that. But what, realistically, is the difference between forcing Milosevic to accept Nato troops in Kosovo and just invading the place? Nato as a whole signed up to a strategy that amounts in practice to a carte blanche for invasion. Now it just has to hold its nerve.
NICK MARTIN-CLARK
London N17
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments