LETTER: Stag hunt services

Patrick J. Ellis
Sunday 18 October 1998 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

LETTER:

Stag hunt services

Sir: Richard O Hall (letter, 14 October) chooses to ignore the role which the three stag hunts in the West Country play in conservation and welfare.

Injured or infirm deer are treated as a top priority and all three hunts operate a 24-hour, 365-day call-out service to deal with any deer that are in trouble. Rifles have always played a part in culling, but their use on open ground can involve a high-calibre bullet travelling many miles and/or ricocheting with fatal consequences. It has been proved many times that the most efficient way of dealing with an injured deer is to locate it with a few hounds and then dispatch it at close range.

The hinds are both hunted and stalked within the legal season when the calves are old enough to look after themselves. They are in only the very early stages of pregnancy.

Whether or not Sir Richard Acland would have acquiesced in the National Trust's ban (Doreen Cronin, letters, 14 October) is pure supposition and irrelevant. There is equally every reason to believe that he would have continued to be a staunch supporter of hunting. The fact remains that his wishes were that stag hunting should continue on his estates after his death. It was to this end that he gave the National Trust the responsibility to maintain them. For them to ignore his last wishes on the strength of extremely dubious research is bound to make possible future donors think twice before committing their families' heritage to the Trust's care.

PATRICK J ELLIS

Watchet, Somerset

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in